Two Men, Two Dogs, One Wilderness: When Hollywood Arrives at the Same Idea
By Stephen Cyrus Sepher
The Strange Coincidence of 2026
Every so often, Hollywood produces two films at nearly the same moment that seem to be speaking the same language.
This year, those films are The Dog Stars and Heart of the Beast. One comes from Ridley Scott and stars Jacob Elordi. The other comes from David Ayer and stars Brad Pitt. They are not remakes of one another, they do not share source material, and there is no apparent creative connection between them. Yet place the basic ingredients side by side and the similarities are difficult to ignore.
Both center on isolated men carrying the weight of lives that existed before the story begins. Both place those men in unforgiving wilderness environments where survival becomes elemental. Both feature aircraft as an important part of the narrative. Both pair their protagonist with a dog that is far more than scenery. And both use that relationship as an emotional counterweight to a world in which human connection has become difficult, dangerous, or nearly impossible.
What makes the comparison even more interesting is the timing. The Dog Stars opened theatrically on August 28, 2026. Heart of the Beast arrives September 25. Two major studio survival films, separated by four weeks, built around remarkably similar pieces.
The obvious question is how that happens.
Two Completely Different Beginnings
The similarities become more interesting when you look at where the stories came from.
The Dog Stars began long before Ridley Scott became involved. Peter Heller published the novel in 2012. The story follows Hig, a pilot surviving in the aftermath of a pandemic that has destroyed most of civilization. He lives at an abandoned airfield with the heavily armed Bangley and his dog, Jasper, flying his small plane over the surrounding territory until a radio transmission gives him reason to believe there may be something beyond the isolated existence he has accepted. Scott's film, written by Mark L. Smith, retains that fundamental architecture: a pilot, an airfield, a dog, isolation and a journey into an uncertain wilderness in search of human connection.
Heart of the Beast came through the screenplay world instead. Cameron Alexander's original script appeared on the 2017 Black List, where its premise was already recognizable: a former special-operations soldier and his retired combat dog trying to return to civilization after a catastrophic accident in the Alaskan wilderness. Years later, that screenplay became the David Ayer film starring Brad Pitt as James Belmont. Paramount's current synopsis has Belmont and his combat dog Odin surviving a plane crash and fighting their way through the Alaskan wilderness together.
That chronology matters. Heller's novel existed in 2012. Alexander's screenplay was circulating publicly within the industry by 2017. These were independent pieces of material years before either current movie went into production.
This isn't a case of one studio seeing another movie and quickly making its own version.
It is something much more familiar to Hollywood: two separate projects traveling through development for years and suddenly reaching production at almost exactly the same time.
Then the Timelines Collided
This is where the story becomes particularly interesting.
In November 2024, The Dog Stars was announced as Ridley Scott's next film, with Mark L. Smith adapting Heller's novel for 20th Century Studios. Paul Mescal was initially attached to the lead before scheduling issues led to Jacob Elordi taking the role. Production eventually moved to Italy, where Scott shot across multiple regions from late April through June 2025.
Meanwhile, Brad Pitt's involvement in Heart of the Beast was announced in January 2025. Principal photography began March 3 in Queenstown, New Zealand, and wrapped in May. The two movies were therefore physically being made during overlapping periods in the spring of 2025, thousands of miles apart.
Think about that for a moment.
In New Zealand, David Ayer was filming Brad Pitt in a wilderness survival story involving a man, a dog and the aftermath of an aviation disaster.
At almost the same time, Ridley Scott was preparing and then filming Jacob Elordi in a survival story involving a man, a dog, an airplane and an isolated landscape.
Neither production could meaningfully have been responding to the finished version of the other. By that stage the machinery was already moving.
And now audiences are receiving the films four weeks apart.
The Dog Is the Difference
The dog may be the most important similarity because in both stories it appears to serve a deeper dramatic purpose.
A survival film naturally strips a character down. Remove the city, the job, the social structure and the comforts of ordinary life, and the filmmaker is left with a human being confronting fear, mortality and instinct. But complete isolation creates another problem: cinema still needs relationship.
The dog solves that problem beautifully.
In The Dog Stars, Jasper connects Hig emotionally to the life he lost. Ridley Scott has specifically discussed the importance of preserving that relationship from Heller's novel. Hig can speak to Jasper, protect him, worry about him and reveal parts of himself that might otherwise remain internal. The animal becomes a connection to memory and to the humanity the surrounding world is slowly trying to remove from him.
Heart of the Beast approaches the relationship from a different direction. Odin is a combat dog, and James Belmont is a Special Forces veteran. Their bond therefore carries the suggestion of shared history before the crash ever happens. Paramount itself describes the film as exploring the unbreakable relationship between the two as they fight through the wilderness together.
In both films, the dog gives the hero something survival alone cannot provide.
Someone to survive for.
The Same Ingredients, Different Movies
This is also where the comparison has limits.
The Dog Stars is fundamentally post-apocalyptic. Civilization has already collapsed after a pandemic, and Hig's journey is ultimately about whether trust, intimacy and humanity remain possible when the social world that once supported them has disappeared. Scott's film is interested in survival, but it is equally interested in what survival means if there is nothing emotionally worth returning to.
Heart of the Beast appears to be a more concentrated physical survival thriller. Belmont survives a plane crash and must make his way through Alaska with Odin. David Ayer comes to that material with a filmography deeply interested in soldiers, loyalty, masculine codes and people functioning under extreme pressure. The external threat is not the collapse of civilization. It is the wilderness itself.
One film asks what remains after the world disappears.
The other asks what remains when a man is stripped down to almost nothing.
The ingredients overlap. The dramatic engines do not.
Why These Stories Now?
Perhaps the more interesting question is not why two similar films happened at the same time, but why this particular kind of story feels commercially attractive again.
Modern life has become extraordinarily complicated. We live through screens, algorithms, constant communication, economic uncertainty and an endless stream of information. Survival stories remove all of it. They reduce existence to recognizable needs: food, shelter, safety, loyalty, companionship and the decision to keep moving.
There is something inherently cinematic about that simplicity.
Hollywood has always returned to wilderness stories when the culture itself feels complicated. The Western did it. War movies do it. Castaway stories do it. Post-apocalyptic films do it. The environment changes, but the underlying attraction remains remarkably consistent.
Take away society and you discover the character.
Add a dog and you discover his heart.
The Business Behind the Coincidence
There is another lesson here for writers and filmmakers.
Hollywood development moves slowly enough that audiences often mistake proximity for imitation. A movie arrives, another similar movie follows, and the natural assumption is that somebody copied somebody else.
The timelines often tell a different story.
The Dog Stars spent fourteen years traveling from Peter Heller's 2012 novel to Ridley Scott's 2026 film. Heart of the Beast can be traced publicly at least as far back as Cameron Alexander's appearance on the 2017 Black List, nearly nine years before its theatrical release.
Projects sit in development. Directors change. Actors become available. Financing arrives. Studios reorganize. Rights move. Schedules suddenly align. A screenplay that seemed impossible to make five years earlier can become attractive because one actor says yes.
Then two completely separate development histories can unexpectedly converge.
That is exactly what makes these two films such an interesting case study.
Twenty-Eight Days Apart
Ridley Scott and David Ayer are very different filmmakers. Jacob Elordi and Brad Pitt occupy very different moments in their careers. Peter Heller's literary post-apocalyptic story and Cameron Alexander's original survival screenplay came into Hollywood through entirely different doors.
Yet in 2025, both productions found themselves in remote landscapes filming variations on an unexpectedly similar image: a solitary man, an airplane, a dog and a world that has suddenly become very large and very dangerous.
Now the movies arrive twenty-eight days apart.
If you enjoyed this narrative, subscribe to the newsletter. This is part of The Conversation Podcast, a storytelling series exploring the human side of art, technology, and ambition.
